I would avoid using gig 0/3 and would not bundle it with gig0/[012] .
Gig0/0 0/1 0/2 are marvel SOCs build-in Ports while Gig0/3 together with the Mangement "Fas"0/0 are on a separate intel ethernetcontrollerchip (with gig+(only)fas they try tonot oversubscribe the internal pci bus ) > One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses only > two, one for IP uplink and another as client-sided downlink with multiple > sub-interfaces named like GigabitEthernet0/1.10 (encapsulation dot1Q). > > It need reconfiguration to use 2x1G port-channles. I already did such > reconfiguration for same 7201 router with small number of sub-interfaces > and know this is doable changing sub-interfaces from GigabitEthernet0/1.N > to Port-channel1.N Just my 0.01 $ Juergen. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
