We have had an issue with 16.9.4 (CSCvq49721 : unable to telnet in a vrf), that is corrected in 16.9.6.
regards > Le 5 sept. 2020 à 11:31, James Bensley <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 14:22, Gaël Garcin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I would suggest 16.09.04 or above in 16.09.x, using it for 1 year as LNS >> without issue. >> >> Best regards, >> Gaël > > +1 for 16.9.4. > > We have rigorously tested 16.9.4 on ASR1009-X's as LNS devices. It's > been rock solid apart from one outstanding bug we have open with Cisco > which relates to RP failover, so it won't apply to you on an > ASR1002-X. > > Cheers, > James. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ — Alain Richard Président & Directeur Technique Email [email protected] Tél 04 77 79 48 00 - Ligne directe 04 77 79 48 11 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
