On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 14:22, Gaël Garcin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I would suggest 16.09.04 or above in 16.09.x, using it for 1 year as LNS > without issue. > > Best regards, > Gaël
+1 for 16.9.4. We have rigorously tested 16.9.4 on ASR1009-X's as LNS devices. It's been rock solid apart from one outstanding bug we have open with Cisco which relates to RP failover, so it won't apply to you on an ASR1002-X. Cheers, James. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
