On 24/Jul/20 15:24, Nick Hilliard wrote: > There are areas where licensing can make sense, but agreed that most > implementations are awful. The case in hand here is akin to having a > chainsaw constantly threatening to cut the branch your business is > sitting on unless you actively stop it from doing so. If other people > want to build and operate networks on this sort of premise, then they > are welcome to do so and I will cheerily wish them all the best. They'll be happy to see the back of our necks. Or not. Who cares :-)... Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Nick Hilliard
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license [email protected]
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license Mark Tinka
