On 15/Dec/19 18:34, Scott Miller wrote: > The 920 would be a rock star for me if they could be used as a BRAS. Nah. For BNG work, you need something with a bit more meat on it. We are deploying an MX204 in a very small part of the network as a BNG to serve a small set of customers. It can do that. That's why I don't complain about the ASR920 not doing Netflow (does it now, I heard rumours). As a Metro-E box, it's fit for purpose. I'd never use it for anything else. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 James Jun
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Drew Weaver
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 James Jun
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Shawn L
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Ed Ronayne
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Brian Knight
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Scott Miller
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Mark Tinka
- [c-nsp] ASR 920 Netflow limitat... Peter Rathlev
- Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Netflow lim... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Netflow lim... Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Nikolas Geyer
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Sebastian Becker
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Bryan Holloway
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Giles Coochey
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 8000 Mark Tinka
