There is a new 920, the ASR-920-12SZ with 12 10/1 gid ports. I think it's a move in the right direction, but I agree, some faster uplink ports would be nice.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 2:00 AM Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 12/Dec/19 16:17, James Jun wrote: > > > > > I agree that ASR-9901 (Starlord) was not the strong response the market > was looking for from Cisco, but they had to go to war with what they had > available at the time (Tomahawk/EZchip NP). This meant MX204 competition > with twice the HW footprint, much higher power draw, etc :-p > > Same discussion I had with them 2 weeks ago. The 9901 isn't really an > answer to the MX204. > > Ultimately, I'd like to see an ASR920-10G, which gives us 12 - 24 ports > of 1/10Gbps, with 4x 10Gbps and/or 2x 100Gbps uplinks, running IOS XE. I > think a box like this would be more competitive than the MX204 for > Metro-E deployments where customers need 10Gbps last mile in the Access. > > We'll see if they listen. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
