On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:02 AM Aaron Gould <[email protected]> wrote: > Which reminds me... I recall if pe-ce is bgp, then redis into l3vpn is > natural and automatic.... true ? > > -Aaron > > As an implementer of MPLS/L3VPN in the enterprise, this is very interesting to me because I am all IGP internally. I sort of assumed that in the provider space that L3VPNs would be accomplished the same way, with an IGP as PE-CE protocol for L3VPN, but here we are. So, in the case of BGP as PE-CE protocol and a small client AS, do you all in the provider space require multiple private ASNs per VPN? I mean (blatant free training request here) how does this get handled by the VPN customer?
Just navel gazing here, but I am wondering if there would be any benefit to me running BGP as my own PE-CE protocol. Thank you, Nathan _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
