On 21/Mar/19 08:06, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Because the customer network is all IS-IS ? > What would be "not shooting myself in the foot" in this case? A protocol designed to speak between 2 different autonomous systems. If that is not an option, not using a routing protocol is also a good idea, i.e., static routing. You're not my immediate competitor, so I'll advise you not to run an IGP with a customer. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol Victor Sudakov
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol Victor Sudakov
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol Michael Hallgren
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol Aaron Gould
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE prot... Nathan Lannine
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE ... Nick Cutting
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE ... Victor Sudakov
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE ... adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE ... Aaron Gould
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol Victor Sudakov
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol Robert Raszuk
- Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE prot... Victor Sudakov
