Agree with James, I have some NCS 5501 as PE and the main issue is the TCAM size.
[]s On 18/01/2019 13:03, James Bensley wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 15:00, Friedrich, Gregor > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> P-role is confirmed by the SP BU. PE-role is partly confirmed, depends on >> your requirements of VRFs, Routes, Acls, QOS. Scale models are recommended. >> >> Regards Gregor > Hi Gregor, > > Yes for P role these are good boxes. We have them at $dayjob as P > nodes and they have been very good so far. > > Cheers, > James. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- ============================================================================= PGP Fingerprint - A2:82:BD:48:EE:8D:C4:99:C2:4E:81:D4:C4:7B:1C:2E:C7:F3:04:C9 ============================================================================= _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
