On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 10:15, Michael Hallgren <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi James, > > Sorry for my lack of precision. PE is what I'm talking about. > > mh
Hi Michael, In the past we have used stuff like NCS5501 when we had a long wait time for ASR9001, so an edge PoP / MPLS PE device. This was a managed service provider scenario deploying L3 VPNs with QoS. It works OK the only problem was the smaller TCAM size, it can't hold loads of routes (ASR9001 can hold up to 2M IPv4) but it did what we needed without too much pain (we had to alter the QoS config but we got the same effect in the end). Cheers, James. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
