Hmm - It cant be - Its not just to one nexthop that all the traffic is heading....i.e there are 3 or 4 destination routers (2 ASR1001s, and the ME3600 (2 of those)...so 4 next-hop addresses....we cant be that unlucky that every one of those addresses is being mapped to gi0/0/20...no, just checked, and it arbitrarily changes based on src ip....but, that could be just cef miss-reporting. ....very frustrating.
________________________________ From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> on behalf of CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 8:45 AM To: Aaron Gould; 'James Bensley'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing Thanks Aaron....thats what Im going to try shortly.....Very strange how cef exact route reports it as load sharing, but it obviously isnt.....and the next-hop link you provided, I have to read, but I think that is what is happening... ________________________________ From: Aaron Gould <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 6:37 AM To: 'CiscoNSP List'; 'James Bensley'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing In my mpls cloud I usually would lag dual gige's together to feed my PE boxes with more bandwidth. Worked well for me -Aaron _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp cisco-nsp Info Page - puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> puck.nether.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the cisco-nsp Archives. Using cisco-nsp: To post a message to all the list members, send ... archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
