Are you running L2VPN traffic across those ECMP links? kind regards Pshem
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 16:59 CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > > Have an ASR920 connected to an ME3600 with 2 x 1Gb links with same ospf > cost (It was a single 1Gb, but secondary 1Gb was added as utilization was > getting close to 1Gb) - Was hoping for at least a partial balance of > traffic across the 2 links, but egress from ASR920 to the ME3600(Ingress to > customers), we are seeing one of the 1Gb links basically maxing out, and > the other doing virtually nothing (10-15Mb/sec)...other direction we are > seeing pretty much 50:50 balance across the 2 x 1Gb links....I know > per-dest algorithm is used, and know that there are a only few big > bandwidth users on the ME3600, but I cant understand why basically "all" of > the traffic is going down one link? > > > Is there anyway to "tweak" the load-sharing of the equal cost paths (I can > only see per-dst as an option) > > > Is a L3 etherchannel going to be any "better" with load-balancing than the > current ospf equal cost? (we have voip running over these links, so want > to avoid packet delivery order issues) > > > Is TE a potential solution in this case? > > > We cant go 10G unfortunately, as the ME3600's dont have 10G ports > unlocked, and they are earmarked for retirement - so stuck with multiple 1G > links for a short-term fix 😞 > > > Appreciate any feedback/suggestions. > > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
