Can the n5k, n7k do pagp+ yet? Sent from a mobile device
On 20/03/2013, at 14:25, Ian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17/03/2013, at 11:23 AM, Jeff Kell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We had been doing PAgP on Cisco-to-Cisco, but leaning toward LACP today >> for anything that supports it. > > In our VSS clusters (Sup2T), we're using PAgP where possible, and LACP to > everything else. PAgP offers dual-active detection for VSS that LACP can't. > Yes, I'd love to have one protocol that worked for everything. No, its never > going to happen. > > Rgds, > > > > - I. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
