On 3/16/2013 8:34 PM, Andrew Miehs wrote: > The cisco documentation recommends static as the recovery times are > supposedly faster due to no negotiation. Not really sure if the downsides > make up for that though.
Yeah, you can screw up your network much faster that way :) We had been doing PAgP on Cisco-to-Cisco, but leaning toward LACP today for anything that supports it. Only recent issues have been some 12.2 Catalyst IOS's that seem to "forget" switchport trunk allowed vlans that get changed on the port-channels and saved (they disappear from the individual interfaces on a reboot). Jeff _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
