Thanks for responding. I'm looking at something like this: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2831/ps4370/product_data_sheet09186a0080092241.html
Will someone connecting to this for OC-48 transport between two locations with MPLS encapsulation (xconnect) notice anything different via a normal mux port? I think what you're saying is, "no". :) On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Mack McBride <[email protected]> wrote: > The POS looks like a standard 6500 layer 3 port with of course the added POS > commands. > This means standard MPLS commands should work. > The older POS cards lack some of the functionality of the newer cards. > Someone may have more information if you provide the exact line card. > > Mack McBride > Network Architect > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of FF > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] OC-48 transport over Cisco 6500 > > If I'm trying to transport OC-48 between two customer locations via > MPLS on a Cisco 6500... > > Would simple MPLS/xconnect work using the appropriate OC-48-OSM on > each side? [i.e., will the OC-48-OSM look like a traditional SONET > interface such as one would see from a 15454 or similar mux to the > customer equipment?] > > thanks in advance, > > -- > > FF > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- FF _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
