On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 18:44 +0200, Christian Meutes wrote: > I don't think that its the same and just depends on FIB operations, > because when the iBGP next-hop disappears, BGP will notice that > through BGP next-hop address tracking (can react quite fast on the IGP > event) and then needs to run its path-decision process to install > alternates.
That's exactly why BGP next-hop tracking isn't always a good idea. :-) -- Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
