Hi, On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:01:29PM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote: > All in all I would personally prefer that we do _something_ and start > seriously deploying/using IPv6, and then in parallel continue discussing > address allocation policy et cetera. :-D
Yes, I fully agree with that (and I've been working on that for a number
of years).
Peter: your mail server needs IPv6... puck has (again), since about half
a year or so, but your mail server delivered over IPv4...
Received: from mail1.rm.dk (mail1.aaa.dk [193.162.116.36])
by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o2GM1tCq084058
"one small step at a time" :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpy0mpwCxAoe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
