Hi, I'm not sure I would want that many port scans, etc being bounced off of my 'connected' router interfaces whether the rest of the IPs are 'routed' or not.
YMMV. -Drew -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jens Link Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:33 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Drew Weaver <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > I believe most people feel that a /126 should be used the same place you > would use /30 Many people feel that a /64 should be used as smallest network size for IPv6 even on point-to-point links. Jens -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://www.quux.de | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: [email protected] | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
