Hi, The question is if the ingress linecard has a DFC3B/BXL or DFC3C/CXL or a CFC (and if a CFC if the Sup is a PFC3B/3BXL or PFC3C/3CXL). You might be hitting CSCtb41832 which from what I understand will be resolved in SXI4 and only applicable to 3C/CXLs.
Cheers, Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gert Doering > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:42 AM > To: David Hughes > Cc: Gert Doering; Cisco Mailing list > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Spanning-Tree vs. EoMPLS links in SXI2? > > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:25:56PM +1000, David Hughes wrote: > > On 11/03/2010, at 11:00 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > > > > > (Well, actually you can, by plugging a loop between two ports, one > > > port being a switchport/trunk and the other port being the EoMPLS > > > link. But that won't gain me much compared to what I have now - if > > > the IOS combination is broken with STP+EoMPLS, it will also be > > > broken if that IOS is running on R1...) > > > > Hate to admit it but I just ran this up on s720/SXI3 boxes. Short > > lived EoMPLS requirement at a site. The whole "external loopback" > > design is such a hack. But, what can I say, it's ugly but it works, > > Yes, seconded - it's ugly but it works. I have to use this in other places, > but it's not really making the configuration any easier to understand for my > junior colleagues. > > > and it's passing MST BPDUs just fine. > > Now that is good news :-) - what line card are you terminating the EoMPLS on? > (I'm asking because I'm wondering whether our problem is specific to > 6724-SFP) > > gert > > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] > fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
