Hi, On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 06:36:44PM +1000, David Hughes wrote: > On 11/03/2010, at 7:33 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > > Workaround: > > Not to Send BPDU over EOMPLS. > > What a fantastic work around. There's a bug that breaks STP so the > work around is not to use STP. Pure genius.
*g*
Actually, this is along the lines of what I expected as one of the
potential responses from this list - "don't build your redundancy on
top of STP" (which is why I explained my setup in somewhat more detail).
There are good arguments for avoiding STP - and "less Cisco bugs to hit"
is certainly one of them... - but still, the workaround is definitely
worth quoting every now and then :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpqFqWRWeUZ4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
