On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:17:56AM -0500, Scott McGrath wrote: >> I can see their point especially in SP networks and to keep the >> counterfeit optics at bay > > Actually, what Cisco did is *create* a market for counterfeit optics.
It's going to get interesting with SFP+ direct-attach: HP Blade Chassis using direct-attach will no doubt require HP direct-attach components. That means you need an HP switch on the other side. Same thing for Cisco Blade Chassis. Got to love vendor lock-in... -- Tim:> Sent from Brooklyn, NY, United States _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
