>
> That is unless you're talking about an Arbor Peakflow SP
> Threat Managment
> System, right? I hear its "a fully integrated component
> [... which] conducts
> surgical mitigation of network and service-layer attacks
> that threaten your
> Internet Data Center." This glossy website in front of me
> also says that for
> Web 2.0 apps, the Peakflow device fully protects a server's
> Web services by
> stopping malformed HTTP packets and rate-limiting HTTP
> requests. And its
> abilities to protect VoIP and DNS servers, as well as
> generic TCP
> normalization techniques are well-advertised.
>
> Are you saying that Arbor networks is misguided about their
> server
> protection devices, Roland?
>
if some guy trust Arbor peakflow anyway automatic interaction between peakflow
and router could be considered. But, threshhold for trigerring and internet
traffic features varies time to time, how could we expect arbot catch the way
all the time?
joe
___________________________________________________________
好玩贺卡等你发，邮箱贺卡全新上线！
http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
