Sorry, should be: "Each CE router is connected to different PE routers"
And also, I forgot, pros/cons with running iBGP between the CE routers? I know this is a benefit on the Internet, with two different ISPs, for optimal routing, but in a MPLS cloud with the same provider I dont see that benefit. Thanks! Roger On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Roger Wiklund <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I have a question regarding AS numbers, whats the best solution, and > pros/cons with the different setups? > > Let say there is an MPLS provider, and one customer has a HUB-site with > dual CPE in the VPN. Each CE router is connected to 2 different PE routers. > Behind each CE router the customer has a Juniper router and are using eBGP > to peer with us. > > They want per session loadsharing between the to CPEs. The MPLS provider > are not planning to run iBGP between the CE routers. Only eBGP to the PE. > > Now, should these 2 CE routers belong the the same AS number? Let say, 100. > Or should they be in separate? 100, and 200? > You should still be able to loadshare with max-path eibgp 2 on the PEs even > if they are in different AS numbers right? It is only the AS path lengt that > is compared, not the actual number if im not misstaken. > > Any pros/cons with the different setups, same AS, different AS. > > Thanks! > Roger > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
