Hi I have a question regarding AS numbers, whats the best solution, and pros/cons with the different setups?
Let say there is an MPLS provider, and one customer has a HUB-site with dual CPE in the VPN. Each CE router is connected to 2 different PE routers. Behind each CE router the customer has a Juniper router and are using eBGP to peer with us. They want per session loadsharing between the to CPEs. The MPLS provider are not planning to run iBGP between the CE routers. Only eBGP to the PE. Now, should these 2 CE routers belong the the same AS number? Let say, 100. Or should they be in separate? 100, and 200? You should still be able to loadshare with max-path eibgp 2 on the PEs even if they are in different AS numbers right? It is only the AS path lengt that is compared, not the actual number if im not misstaken. Any pros/cons with the different setups, same AS, different AS. Thanks! Roger _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
