We have several 3560G switches deployed as access switches in a small data center environment. With the increased use of Gig at the access layer, the notion of using EtherChannel to get increased uplink bandwidth back to a WS-X6548-GE is something we've been discussing recently too. As has been discussed, this won't work the way we'd like it to due to the over subscription design of the X6548. That said, would an EtherChannel setup between the SFP ports on the 3560G and a X6516-GBIC card in the 6509 have any similar type of limitation, or would it work to acheive the increased uplink bandwidth?
Also, is the only difference between the WS-X6516-GBIC and the WS-X6516A-GBIC the per port buffer size? Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
