Ivan, > > BTW, even the more "traditional" fast convergence techniques (internal BGP > fast fallover) might be too aggressive and do more harm than good. >
Could you elaborate little more on that? I thought it would be a good idea (e.g. neighbor X fall-over route-map) to drop BGP session with a neighbour that suddenly "dissapeared" from the network. In my scenario I am concerned that the scanner doesn't invalidate the routes because I have catch-all aggregate covering all my NHs floating there (I can't have full table so I have 0/0 from upstreams so I need the aggregate for my routes) so in other words it takes 3 minutes to close the broken session. Best Regards, -mat _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
