Hi Herman Actually yes more yields more. Years ago I used to do 3d stuff with dual 35mm slr shooting slide film. We used polarized glasses/projectors and pin registered glass projection mounts. I had a bracket with cameras side by side. It looked great evan with fairly big horizontal mis alignment. It's really a forgiving medium. It's not so forgiving with vertical error though. Here's a good explanation of how a beamsplitter 3d system works, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX7ybS7fnow With the beam splitter system you get a more accurate parallax versus side by side where you are having to rotate cameras off axis to align. ciao Daniel
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ichthyostega <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Jircik schrieb: >> I was about to start a thread on this very subject. I am really interested in >> Elphel workflow as well particularly their upcoming 3d head. > > Hi Daniel, > > is there anything new upcoming by Elphel? > I didn't follow the development closely, but the only thing I noticed > was their 3D setup, which unfortunately has quite an exaggerated baseline > of 25cm, which makes it unusable for anything beyond gimmicks. > > Ideally, a stereo setup should be close to the average human > eye distance of 65mm. The bodies of the elphel cameras should easily > allow for such a setup (and actually I don't understand how they came > to build a 248mm baseline. Maybe a typical stereo beginners misconception > that "more yields more"...?) > > Hermann > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cinelerra mailing list > [email protected] > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
