> On Wednesday, 2. April 2008 09:13:42 Norval Watson wrote: >> I loaded a miniDV clip from my cheap Samsung video camera and selected >> Interlace mode - Not Interlaced >> Then I rendered to raw DV, encoded with mencoder, and uploaded to Vimeo.
>> All the tests seem to have the same level of comb artefacts. >> And there seems to be no variation in motion quality, ie. "jumpiness" or >> "smoothness". On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:19:22 +0200, Kurt Georg Hooss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i believe your camcorder material is interlaced > which is a good standard for display on tv screens. It's definitely interlaced. I saw you also posted a deinterlaced version as well. Did you use Cinelerra's deinterlacer on that clip? You might want to give mencoder's yadif deinterlacer a try to compare the results of the two deinterlacers. I find the result of the yadif deinterlacer is quite good. John _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
