-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Adam williams schreef: > Based on the lack of enthusiasm for different names, we assume 2 > different projects will share the Cinelerra trademark going forward. > The next Heroine Virtual Ltd. release will be Cinelerra 4 to keep > versioning chronological. Usually when we did rewrites in the past, the > version numbers started over at 1, the name changed, and the value of > the work was what moved people to the new rewrite. Is the value in the > work really so limited that you have to call new projects Cinelerra and > version 3?
I think it is a different setup. For example when I first used Broadcast2000 (think it was in Mandrake) I was very happy with the product, there was nothing else that did the tricks I wanted. And I didn't find any community around it. With the CinelerraCV people there are people that care and help you if something is broken. For a company that would identify itself with Heroine Warrior it is the name that keeps the 'group' of people together that makes a product with any name. Here the name of this group is CinelleraCV, hence changing the name would mean changing the group name too. It would be more analogue to Heroine Warrior Inc. changing to something different. It might be something of historical value like "this is where we came from". On the other hand you are very right suggesting a new product should have a new name. Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHqQ8qYH1+F2Rqwn0RCmEaAJ0Ym1c/vaDcZEOqtBm5js7yOpTKlgCfffa/ XhsS5Hx/FQ/V0gjpfL4Cn+Q= =hu2+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
