Dear Andraz,
Don't you think that providing all the packages is a nonsense?
Distros should do this if there is a common interest. In ubuntu it is
a nonsense to have 1 apt-source for 1 program!
I would rather prefer that cinelerra:
0) cinerella runs from its source dir e.g. cd hvirtual;./cinelerra works
1) there exists a binary tar - as static as possible
(all "video" libs for sure as static) which you unpack and run.
I notice that cin anyways contains most of libs inside- really good.
2) this tar is generated (semi)automatically after each svn revision,
and all
older tars are also preserved.
I never used any ubuntu packages of cin because they where always too old.
Cin is not in "final shape" and sometimes minor changes matters.... ;-)
Also it would be nice to be able to use 2 versions at the same time
which is rather
difficult at the moment. .bcast should have also version number,
event like .bcast2.1r945.
I also never understood why make install "spreads" the program into few
dirs across
my system.... then e.g. running 2 versions is cumbersome.
Just my 3 cents
The best
Marcin
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
