arphaman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49523#1171484, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> The extensions itself seems like a reasonable way to provide compile commands > for the individual files. In case didChangeConfiguration does not work for > you for some reason, happy to take a look at this change too. > One drawback of using didChangeConfiguration for compile commands is that it > forces global invalidation, which may be a bad thing if your client tracks > compile commands on a smaller scale and can send requests to invalidate > individual files. However, if you're happy with it, we might get away with > not adding yet another mechanism to pass compile commands to clangd, which is > definitely a good thing! We actually need both mechanisms. I posted the didChangeConfiguration extension to https://reviews.llvm.org/D49758. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D49523 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
