aprantl added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47097#1111223, @gramanas wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47097#1111149, @probinson wrote:
>
> > Can we step back a second and better explain what the problem is? With 
> > current Clang the debug info for this function looks okay to me.
> >  The store that is "missing" a debug location is homing the formal 
> > parameter to its local stack location; this is part of prolog setup, not 
> > "real" code.
>
>
> Isn't this the reason the artificial debug loc exists? The store in the 
> prolog might not be real code but it should still have the scope that the 
> rest of the function has.


Instructions that are part of the function prologue are supposed to have no 
debug location, not an artificial one. The funciton prologue ends at the first 
instruction with a nonempty location.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D47097



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to