gramanas added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47097#1111149, @probinson wrote:
> Can we step back a second and better explain what the problem is? With > current Clang the debug info for this function looks okay to me. > The store that is "missing" a debug location is homing the formal parameter > to its local stack location; this is part of prolog setup, not "real" code. Isn't this the reason the artificial debug loc exists? The store in the prolog might not be real code but it should still have the scope that the rest of the function has. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D47097 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
