xbolva00 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1086553, @pfultz2 wrote:
> > I think the premise is a bit off the mark. It's not that these are not for > > the common user -- it's that they're simply not ready for users at all. > > Then why was it merged into clang in the first place? It seems like the whole > point of merging it into clang is to get user feedback. > > Furthermore, I am trying to update the conversion checker to report more > errors, and I would like it to be exposed to users so I can find or fix the > FPs. If users cannot find / use it, you will not get any feedback. How can they be better checkers if no feedback received? If nobody should use it, remove this "dead" code Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
