lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1086463, @pfultz2 wrote:
> > As Devin says (and as we discussed this with Anna Zaks) alpha checkers are > > still in development, so we don't want to expose them to the users, even > > very curious ones. > > Then why do we make them available with `clang --analyze`? If the plan is not > to expose them to the users at all, they should be removed from the codebase, > as they are just sitting there bit-rotting. > > Ideally, I see no problem exposing them to users. This will allow more users > to run them on their codebases and submit issues or patches for the problems > they find. Just so i'm perfectly clear, i find this "they are not for common user, so let's not expose them at all" approach very Gnome-like, and not really appropriate for LLVM. With that approach, there should also not be a https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#cmdoption-clang-fexperimental-new-pass-manager and maybe some other flags. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
