ahatanak added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45382#1060163, @rjmccall wrote:
> Hmm. I'm not actually sure *why* it's not okay to forward callee-cleanup > arguments. Do we just not have the necessary logic to disable the cleanup in > the caller? It seems that it would be OK if there was a way to disable the cleanup in the caller when we know that we are delegating to another constructor, possibly by setting the DelegateCXXConstructorCall here too. But maybe there are other reasons for not doing so. Perhaps Richard (who committed r274049) knows why we can't call the delegated constructor when there are callee-cleanup arguments? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45382 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
