alexfh added inline comments.
================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/misc-suspicious-semicolon-fail.cpp:5 -// RUN: clang-tidy %s -checks="-*,misc-suspicious-semicolon,clang-diagnostic*" \ -// RUN: -- -DWERROR -Wno-everything -Werror=unused-variable 2>&1 \ // RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-WERROR \ ---------------- This reminds me that we should also filter out all -W(no-)error.* compiler arguments, if we're to take full control of clang diagnostics and make them behave closer to native checks. ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/validate-check-names.cpp:2 // Check names may only contain alphanumeric characters, '-', '_', and '.'. -// RUN: clang-tidy -checks=* -list-checks | grep '^ ' | cut -b5- | not grep -v '^[a-zA-Z0-9_.\-]\+$' +// RUN: clang-tidy -checks=*,-clang-diagnostic* -list-checks | grep '^ ' | cut -b5- | not grep -v '^[a-zA-Z0-9_.\-]\+$' ---------------- Which clang diagnostic names fail this test? https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
