juliehockett added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-doc/BitcodeWriter.cpp:407
+
+void ClangDocBinaryWriter::writeBitstream(const EnumInfo &I,
+                                          BitstreamWriter &Stream,
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> Hmm, common pattern again
> ```
> void ClangDocBinaryWriter::writeBitstream(const <TYPENAME> &I,
>                                           BitstreamWriter &Stream,
>                                           bool writeBlockInfo) {
>   if (writeBlockInfo) emitBlockInfoBlock(Stream);
>   StreamSubBlock Block(Stream, BI_<ENUM_NAMETYPE>_BLOCK_ID);
>   ...
> }
> ```
> Could be solved if a mapping from `TYPENAME` -> `BI_<ENUM_NAMETYPE>_BLOCK_ID` 
> can be added.
> If LLVM would be using C++14, that'd be easy, but with C++11, it would 
> require whole new class (although with just a single static variable).
Do you want me to try to write that class, or leave it as it is?


================
Comment at: clang-doc/Mapper.cpp:113
+  populateInfo(I, D, C);
+  I.Loc.emplace_back(Location{LineNumber, File});
+}
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> ```
> I.Loc.emplace_back({LineNumber, File});
> ```
That...doesn't work? Throws a no-matching-function error (suggesting to try 
emplacing a Location instead of a <brace-enclosed initializer list>


https://reviews.llvm.org/D41102



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to