malcolm.parsons added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43500#1013497, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Is there a way to make clang-apply-replacements smarter rather than forcing > every check to jump through hoops? I'm worried that if we have to fix > individual checks we'll just run into the same bug later. See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161017/174238.html Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D43500 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
