NoQ added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Analysis/inlining/temp-dtors-path-notes.cpp:17
+ // expected-note@-2{{Returning from constructor for 'C'}}
+ // expected-note@-3{{Calling '~C'}}
+}
----------------
george.karpenkov wrote:
> Should we have "returning from ~C"? At least we do have it for inlined
> functions.
Not here, because the bug occurs within `~C`. But we should definitely test it,
yeah.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43144
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
