rjmccall added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/AST/ExprClassification.cpp:652 + if (Ctx.getCanonicalType(ASE->getBase()->getType()).isConstQualified()) + return Cl::CM_ConstQualified; + ---------------- avt77 wrote: > rjmccall wrote: > > Is there a reason why the places that compute the type of these l-value > > expressions don't propagate qualiifers? This hardly seems restricted to > > 'const'. > Do you mean ExtVectorElementExpr/ArraySubscriptExpr should retrun > isConstQualified() == true by themselves (and other qualifiers as well)? In the sense that Sema should create them with a type that is const-qualified when the underlying vector l-value is const-qualified, yes. https://reviews.llvm.org/D42530 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
