nik marked an inline comment as done.
nik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:4782
+
+ return 0;
+}
----------------
jbcoe wrote:
> Might be worth asserting here.
Good idea. I've done the same for the setter.
================
Comment at: unittests/libclang/LibclangTest.cpp:596
+TEST_F(LibclangPrintingPolicyTest, GetProperty) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(2U, clang_PrintingPolicy_getProperty(Policy,
CXPrintingPolicy_Indentation));
+}
----------------
jbcoe wrote:
> It would be useful, albeit tedious, to add get/set test pairs for each
> property.
I think we have the basic functionality of the getter and setter covered.
Testing each getter/setter for each property would mostly help to verify the
mapping in the getters/setters - initially I've ruled out that possibility with
the macros (once the macro is correct - but that's much easier to check). I
would prefer to go back to the macro version than adding a test here that goes
over all properties.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39903
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
