malcolm.parsons added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171#927045, @alexfh wrote:
> The only place I can think of, where -checks=* is useful is in combination > with -list-checks, where the presence of clang-diagnostic- entries would be > desired anyway. Can we replace -list-checks with -list-enabled-checks and -list-all-checks? The current behaviour is confusing and recently caused Chandler to abandon a clang-tidy demo. https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
