vsapsai marked an inline comment as done.
vsapsai added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/enum.c:128
+// PR28903
+struct PR28903 { // expected-warning {{empty struct is a GNU extension}}
+ enum {
----------------
rnk wrote:
> This is a simpler test case that fixes the extraneous diagnostics:
> struct PR28903 {
> enum {
> E1 = (enum { // expected-error-re {{...}}
> E2, E3 = E2
> })0
> } e;
> };
>
Removed extraneous diagnostics in slightly different way. Keep enum constants
prefixed with PR28903 because in C struct doesn't create a scope for enum
constants and I want to avoid polluting test namespace with common names like
E1, E2, E3.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37089
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
