On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Volodymyr Sapsai via Phabricator via cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > vsapsai added a comment. > > Thanks for following up, Alberto. I haven't expected such a use case. It is > possible to achieve the same with `LSA_SIZEOF_SA = sizeof(((len_and_sockaddr > *)0)->u)` but I don't like it and don't want to force developers using such > approach. > > For solving this problem I think to restrict error only to C++ and to allow > tags inside enums for C. Alberto, what do you think, will it work for you? > And from implementation perspective allowing tags in enums for C should be > safe because things go haywire for C++ while checking access rules and C > doesn't have access rules.
That construct is well-formed C code, but isn't in C++ (C++ restricts the places where you can define a new type compared to what C allows). ~Aaron > > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D37089 > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
