zturner added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-nested-exprs.cpp:44 + int a = bar(x, y) + + baz(x, z) + + qux(y, z); ---------------- inglorion wrote: > zturner wrote: > > Can you make a function called `int foo()` and make this `int a = > > bar(foo(), y) + ...` > Yes. Why? To test an additional level of nesting? Yes. for that matter, even better would be if this call to `foo()` spans multiple lines. Right here you've got a single statement which spans multiple lines, but no individual sub-expression spans multiple lines. And FWICT there is no nesting at all, since + is just a builtin operator. https://reviews.llvm.org/D37529 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
