TPPPP72 wrote: > > > This PR doesn't appear to comply with our policy on tool-generated > > > content, and requires additional justification for why it is valuable > > > enough to the project for us to review it. Please see our developer > > > policy on AI-generated contributions: > > > http://llvm.org/docs/AIToolPolicy.html > > > > > > Thank you for reminding me about the LLVM AI policy. I need to clarify that > > the code was handwritten and has already run and passed the relevant AST > > and Sema tests locally, and has been formatted using `git clang-format`. > > The Pull Request content was generated by AI, and since English is not my > > native language, I wanted the AI-generated language to be more > > professional. I have just modified the AI-generated pull request > > description. > > Using translation tools is absolutely acceptable, the requirement is for you > to have written the PR description yourself - you can write the PR comment > and description and translate that. The problem with pure LLM generated > descriptions is that they are usually longer than needed, and seem to be > wrong more often than not.
Thank you for pointing it out. I didn't expect that using AI to write pull request content would lead to a misunderstanding. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183274 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
