ojhunt wrote: > > This PR doesn't appear to comply with our policy on tool-generated content, > > and requires additional justification for why it is valuable enough to the > > project for us to review it. Please see our developer policy on > > AI-generated contributions: http://llvm.org/docs/AIToolPolicy.html > > Thank you for reminding me about the LLVM AI policy. I need to clarify that > the code was handwritten and has already run and passed the relevant AST and > Sema tests locally, and has been formatted using `git clang-format`. The Pull > Request content was generated by AI, and since English is not my native > language, I wanted the AI-generated language to be more professional. I have > just modified the AI-generated pull request description.
Using translation tools is absolutely acceptable, the requirement is for you to have written the PR description yourself - you can write the PR comment and description and translate that. The problem with pure LLM generated descriptions is that they are usually longer than needed, and seem to be wrong more often than not. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183274 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
