klimek added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34696#795020, @arphaman wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34696#793613, @klimek wrote:
>
> > The main thing I'm concerned about is having the main code in core, but 
> > having all tests in tools-extra. I think if we go that route we should also 
> > move clang-rename and its tests to core. Thoughts?
>
>
> Would it be better if I make a patch for the `clang-refactor` tool first and 
> then update this patch to support some of clang-rename's functionality in 
> clang-refactor and move the tests over? Or should I just move all of 
> clang-rename and its tests to clang's repository first and then focus on 
> clang-refactor?


Given the end goal is clear, I'm fine with either :)


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D34696



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to