arphaman added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34696#793613, @klimek wrote:

> The main thing I'm concerned about is having the main code in core, but 
> having all tests in tools-extra. I think if we go that route we should also 
> move clang-rename and its tests to core. Thoughts?


Would it be better if I make a patch for the `clang-refactor` tool first and 
then update this patch to support some of clang-rename's functionality in 
clang-refactor and move the tests over? Or should I just move all of 
clang-rename and its tests to clang's repository first and then focus on 
clang-refactor?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D34696



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to